Nurses, Death, and Terror on The Terraces

In this article I am going to look at the narrative side to econometric analysis, and what we gain from understanding bundles of data through an instrumental variable. There are various limitations to this type of analysis, in my opinion the most major one being the requirement of a natural experiment, and all the factors, which may go wrong alongside that. This is going to be based on a lecture by Matt Dickson a researcher who is currently looking at the raising of the school leaving age and consequent effects on the labour force survey. 

Policing and Crime

This is based on the academic paper “Panic on the Streets of London: Police, Crime, and the July 2005 terror attacks”

The government has a specific interest in policing and crime through an economic perspective due to the associated costs and its effect on the general population. The statistics used for this analysis are the total amount of recorded crimes per 1000 of population, and the amount of police officers per 1000 of the population, for a respective year in the United Kingdom.

We can see that the crime rate and police rate increased alongside each other from the 1960s onwards, but from 1990 onwards there is a decline. This applied for violent crimes, robbery, etc. In this we can conclude that more police officers does not facilitate more crime and vice-versa. In this there is a positive correlation, which does not tell us about causation in the relationship.

The academic paper mentioned above uses a fixed variable in order to examine the correlation, in that the influx of police was rare due to the terrorist threat. This allows a natural experiment to be created, as the increase in police had nothing to do with “conventional” crime.

The paper specifies a treatment group that consists of the London boroughs of Westminster, Kensington, Camden, Islington, and Tower Hamlet, while the controlled group is every other borough in London. There was hardly any difference in police deployment throughout those areas before the attacks. During the operation of increased policing due to the attacks where there was effectively police on every corner. Now considering the crime rate we see that before the period crime in the treatment areas was a bit higher, but then with expanded police force we see that the crime rate drops after and during the attack period for the treatment group. This had shown a definite decrease in crime rate, but it required a massive spike in the number of police per 1000. The data allows us to establish that there was an approximate elasticity of how changing policy changes the crime rate. Resulting in an elasticity of 0.38, so a 10% increase in police numbers reduces crime by approximately 4%.

The critique that we may employ here is that due to the very nature of the natural experiment, it may have had an unaccounted for effect on the operation of crime. There is also no control comparison so a terrorist attack without a changed police response. Making it difficult to immediately take this statistical analysis at face value, clarifying the limitation of natural experiment.

However, the results are still interesting. Allowing us to expand our analysis into what kind of policing would be required to keep crime at a desired level, accepting the fact that we cannot eradicate crime. The cost of developing this kind of police force can be brought into consideration or whether other methods can be introduced which would be as effective but at a lower cost, in this noting the CCTV network developed throughout London.

Nurses Pay & Death

In healthcare payment for nurses is based on equity, in that everyone does the same job therefore they should have the same pay. However, this may have unintended consequences on the service that nurses provide, and the extent to which agency nurses are employed.

If we consider where there is a greater use of agency nurses and death rate from heart attack we see a concentration around London, the Home Counties, and a few Northern cities. In this one may suggest that the quality of agency nurses is lower hence the death rate. However, we can note that there may be reverse causation. Hospitals with high death rates struggle to employ and maintain staff; thereby making agency nurses a requirement. It is also an assumption that agency nurses are more likely to give poor service.

We can breakdown this relationship through considering outside wages as a third variable because it affects the use of agency nurses but not necessarily the quality of the hospital. Carol Propper and John Van Reenan outline the employment of agency nurses and the quality of healthcare in greater detail in the paper “Can Pay Regulation Kill? Panel Data Evidence on the Effect of Labour Markets on Hospital Performance”

School and Wages

How much is education worth?

Education has an impact on fiscal policy, welfare, labour, and crime. Increasing education could lead to a decrease in crime, and a variety of other relationships. Highlighting the importance we place on education in economics.

Considering a distribution of hourly wages and years of schooling we may note a positive relationship whereby years of schooling increases alongside hourly wage. Some problems we run into when considering education:

  • Education is not randomly distributed amongst the population.
  • People choose how long to remain in education.
  • There are unobserved and unmeasureable factors that lead to higher wages.
  • We hope that we can pick two random people and by years of education be able to assign them a wage

The natural experiment used here looks at the school leaving ages from 1949 to 1967:

The people who were forced to stay in school just stayed the one more year after 15. This made them move from the 15 age group to the 16 age group leaving, at that point around 60% had left school but this had a positive effect on wages.

RoSLA – Raising of the School Leaving Age

Pre-RoSLA and Post-RoSLA comparison, the average age of leaving education increased, and meant that 1/3 people stayed in school longer. The policy change made this an effective natural experiment. We can consider the indifference difference:

A whole extra year of schooling meant a 6% increase in hourly wage. Why did it have this effect?

Breaking up periods, when you could leave school. This resulted in a far greater proportion with academic qualification for those that could not leave before the summer exams. It does it for a greater extent to those that are post-RoSLA.

Dickson and Smith in 2011 have looked in detail at the labour force survey and the effect of raising the school leaving age if we were to exploit another increase in the minimum leaving age. This would be exploited again, by moving the age bracket again achieving higher qualification, resulting in a greater wage in theory. The question brought here is to what extent will this relationship hold?

Education is always a difficult variable due to our inability to measure to what extent it has been effective, the issue that arises is that even if everyone got the same education individuals would have gained different benefit. Let alone the fact that there are a variety of programs and courses, which pupils may take.

Copyright Almog Adir © 2014 · All Rights Reserved · My Website

Monopoly – Theory of The Firm

Monopoly Abnormal profit

The above diagram represents the existence of a monopoly, due to the abnormal profit shown. The firm operating at this point is profit maximizing, and abnormal profit means that they have more profit than they need to break-even at the point of normal profit.

Through this graph it can be noted that the firm is not a maximum productive efficiency, as the condition for a firm to at maximum productive efficiency would be to produce at the lowest point of average total cost.  It can be noted that the firm is operating just above the lowest point of average total cost. The reason this represents maximum productive efficiency is because all of the costs of the firm are being met by revenue generated by the sold products.

Furthermore, the firm is not operating at the point of maximum allocative efficiency. This can be identified through the fact that the price at the point of profit maximization is not equal to marginal cost. This lack of allocative efficiency represents a type of market failure (in this case the existence of monopoly), this is shown by the dead-weight loss which is the highlighted triangle in the graph.

Economics IB Unit 1 Review

Section 1.1

Define: Nature of Market

The market is the place at which consumers can purchase the goods or services that producer’s supply. In the case of modern markets they are based around the “free-market” system where supply is dependent on the creation or existing demand.

Free Market vs. Command Economy

Command Economy is where the government becomes involved in all transactions between consumers and producers, with disregard to the pricing mechanisms in the free market they may set supply at a constant amount or set price ceilings or floors and create subsidies.

The free market will allow the pricing mechanism of the balance of supply and demand to decide the cost of goods and services. This is known as ceteris paribus, the equilibrium of the market is where the supply intersects demand; therefore supply is equal to demand at a given price.


The Law of Demand: The Law of Demand states that as the price of a good or service decreases then more people will want to consume the good or service. Whereas when the price increases less people are able to afford the good or service therefore a lesser quantity demanded.

Demand is generalised for the market, in a sense it incorporates all the individual demand curves of consumers and averages it to show market demand. For example my personal demand for bread may be relatively elastic in comparison to the market demand as others rely upon bread and therefore express an inelastic relationship.

Demand Curve: The basis of the demand curve is that as the price increases the quantity demanded is smaller, whereas as the price decreases the quantity demanded increases due to two factors:

  1. The product is more affordable therefore a wider range of consumers can express effective demand for the product or service.
  2. The opportunity cost of the product is lower, meaning that if I spent £5 on coffee it would mean I could not spend that £5 elsewhere, but now the coffee costs £2.50 which means that I still have £2.50 left to spend on other products.

P1 - elasticities of demand

Determinants of Demand

Demand can be determined by several factors, of which price is not included

Micro Determinants

  • Trend/Hype
  • Branding
  • Substitutes or Complementary
  • Addiction
  • “Better Living” or “Greater Utility”

Macro Determinants

  • Seasonal
  • Laws
  • Population Growth
  • Income increase/decrease
  • Tax
  • Technological Change

Movements on Demand vs. Shifts of Demand

A movement on the demand curve is related to the change of price, in relation to the quantity demand. As known if the price increases there will be less quantity demanded and vice-versa.

A shift of demand however is when the change in price can be affected by a change in the quantity demanded not as a result of the change in price. For example the demand curve would shift outwards when the product has become trendy, or the price of the substitute good may have increased, or it has become summer and in the case of ice cream more popular. It would shift inwards in the case of the substitute good becoming cheaper, or a that the product is no longer “trendy” or laws have made it illegal to consume the good in certain places or in certain amounts.


Law of Supply: As the price of a good or service increases, the manufacturer is willing to produce more therefore supply increases proportionally to price.

Supply is generalised for the market, one supplier may be willing to produce a given amount at a certain price and it may differ between suppliers of that one good or service, the market represents the average supply relationship of the good or service.

Supply Curve: Suppliers want to supply more of a good at a higher price as they have the ability to create greater revenue from selling more while at a higher price.

When the supply curve is inelastic it means that due to factors of production and scarcity that the supplier may not be able to immediately react to an increase in price through greater demand as they will not be able to produce more of the good or service.

When the supply curve is elastic it means that there is an ease of production and supply of that good or service meaning that if there is a change in price more of the good can be made or provided in the timespan to increase the supply to meet the demand.

P2 - elasticities of supply

Non-Price Determinants of Supply:


  • Change in the cost of the factors of production (e.g. wheat costs more so to make bread costs more)
  • A change in the price of products or services the firm could have provided


  • Government Law restricting or allowing supply (restricting = quotas, allowing = subsidies)
  • Improvement in technology allowing the produced more efficiently
  • Indirect taxes

Movements on Supply vs. Shifts of Supply

There is a movement on the supply curve when there is a change in the price of the product itself based on price signals, this will lead to a change in the amount of the good or service being supplied.

A shift in supply is when there is a change in the firm’s ability to supply the product, so the quantity supplied changes therefore having an effect on price.

The Combination of Supply & Demand Creating Market Equilibrium

The use of supply and demand in the case of the free market is the central pricing mechanism of goods and services. Market equilibrium, represents where the quantity demanded meets the quantity supplied and where all other things are equal.

This is the system that is considered to be the most efficient in allocating resources, but can be subject to government intervention in the case of market failure (see section 1.3)

It is through market equilibrium that we find our solution to the “economic problem”. This is the solution of three main points

  1. What to produce
  2. How much to produce
  3. For whom or what to produce

This solves the issue of the factors of production which are:

Land, Labour, Capital, and Enterprise


Market Equilibrium:

The market equilibrium is where supply meets demand, in formal terms the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity being supplied and therefore at market equilibrium.

P5 - equilibrium

Here it is shown that demand has significantly dropped due to a price increase of the supply, without a shift in demand or supply. This leads to less effective demand meaning that less people are able to consume the product/service at the new price. This leads to a supplier surplus as they have unconsumed goods or services. So quantity supplied is greater than quantity demanded. This can occur in price floors (minimum)

P4 - Surplus

Here it is shown that demand has increased as the price of the good or service has decreased, this is based on a change of price in supply without a shift in demand or supply. Since the product or service is cheaper more consumers can express effective demand. Therefore, the quantity demanded is greater than the quantity supplied, this can occur in price ceilings (maximum)

P3 - Shortage

The Role of Price Mechanism

Scarcity: When something is both desired and limited

This solves the issue of what to produce, as what is desired is produced and its cost is associated with how limited the good or service is. As there is no good or service which is infinite this is why there is price.

Choice results in opportunity cost as we give up spending disposable income elsewhere when we spend it on a certain good or service. It can be considered as the actual cost as we give something else up.

Psychology: Less choice greater utility, against the belief that we will be happier with more choice.

Market Efficiency:

The market is considered to be functioning efficiently at the point of equilibrium as no resources are being wasted or underused, following this there is the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) which overviews the allocation of resources in relation to the most efficient production method to meet the demand of certain goods.


In the diagram on the right is the production possibility frontier for the production of guns or butter. Any point on the curve represents a certain amount of guns being produced in the utilization of resources in comparison to butter. There is a point of equilibrium where as much of the resource is used between making butter and guns. At point A the market is inefficient as there is the underutilization of resources, whereas at point x it is impossible due to the scarcity of resources. On most occasions the PPF is a curve; however it can be a linear negative line if opportunity cost is constant.

P6 - PPF

In a worked example it may be capital goods vs. consumer goods. This is an important example as the two products are complementary; capital goods are used to create consumer goods, such as pizza ovens producing pizza. This is when the PPF can become useful in showing how resources are allocated and utilized in the interest of market efficiency.

Consumer Surplus vs. Producer Surplus:

In the graph below the combination of both the red and blue sections can be considered as the social surplus.

P7 - Social Surplus

Consumer surplus takes into consideration all consumers below the demand curve but above equilibrium price as there was a consumer who was willing to pay price 10 to consume the good but only had to pay price 5 and this is the consumer surplus. The producer surplus is any point above supply but below the equilibrium. This is because there was a producer willing to supply at 1 but gets to sell at 5 which is their surplus.

This is an important concept in relation to market failures, government intervention and elasticity’s. As it shows whether society as a whole is better or worse off, or if due to certain policies or change in elasticity a consumer is better off or a producer. There is a greater interest in surplus being equal rather than greater surplus for one side of society.

Allocative Efficiency:

Is when there is the maximisation of social surplus, by increasing both producer and consumer surplus. This is in the interest of creating competitive yet efficient markets. This is the point where the marginal benefit (Mb) is equal to the marginal cost (Mc).

Section 1.2 Elasticity’s

Price Elasticity of Demand

P8 - PED

The price elasticity of demand is what determines the elasticity of the demand curve as function of the percentage change in quantity demanded to the ratio of the percentage change in price. It involves how demand responds to a change in price.

PED will be treated as a positive number but in graphs it will be plotted as a negative to the nature of the law of demand.

If it is greater than 1 it is elastic if it is smaller than 1 it is inelastic.

IF PED = 1 it is unitary it means that demand is perfectly inversely proportional (1%:1%)

IF PED = 0 it is perfectly inelastic (vertical)

IF PED = ∞ it is perfectly elastic (horizontal)

PED varies along a straight line as it is percentage change rather than the given unit to calculate the percentage change you take the difference divided by the original multiplied by 100.

Price Elasticity of Supply

P9 - PES


The price elasticity of supply is what determines the elasticity of the supply curve as a function of the percentage change in quantity supplied to the ratio of the percentage change in price. It involves how supply responds to a change in price.

If the percentage change in Q is greater than the percentage change in P it is elastic, and vice versa

%Q > %P = elastic

%Q < %P = inelastic

IF PES = 1 it is unitary it means that supply is perfectly proportional to price (1%:1%)

IF PES = 0 it is perfectly inelastic

IF PES = ∞ it is perfectly elastic

Primary commodities are price elasticity of supply inelastic as they have limiting factors of production, such as potatoes there may be an increase in demand but factors of production limit the amount that can be produced. Whereas when price elasticity of supply is elastic there are no restraining factors of production, such as manufacturers of goods, they can keep factories open longer or simply make more.

Cross-Elasticity of Demand (XED)

P10 - XED

XED looks at how goods can be substitutes or complementary to each other.

When XED is Positive the two goods are substitutes (consuming one = not consuming the other)

When XED is Negative the two goods are complementary (consuming one = consuming the other)

The value of XED is completely dependent on how related the goods are to each other, for an example butter and guns are completely unrelated, however pizza and burgers are.

When the goods are completely unrelated XED is given a value of 0

XED takes into account the price sensitivity of one goods effect on the demand of the other good.

Income Elasticity of Demand (YED)

P11 - YED

How responsive demand is when there is a change in income!

YED looks at how a change in income affects the quantity of a specific good demanded. This can be applied in a variety of cases where certain goods may only be accessible to wealthy consumers. But if there is a positive change in income they may be able to exert greater demand for a specific good.

Normal Goods = Positive YED

Inferior Goods = Negative YED

When YED < 1 = Income inelastic good (a necessity such as bread, petrol, water)

When YED > 1 = Income elastic good (luxury items and services)

When YED < 0 = Inferior goods (second hand clothes) This happens because when there is a positive increase in percentage change in income, there will be a negative percentage change in quantity demanded.

1.3 Government Intervention

Indirect Tax:

An indirect tax is a tax taken by the government through the consumption of goods or services, rather than direct tax which is directly from income.

There are many examples of indirect taxes, such as VAT, Sales Tax, Excise Tax (Sin Tax), and Duty.

Why is there indirect tax?

  • Source of Government Revenue: Can keep income tax lower due to revenue from excise tax
  • An attempt to reduce consumption of goods that have a negative effect unaccounted for in the original price. (discouragement of consumption of de-merit goods)
  • Helps to redistribute income, if it is percentage ad valorem tax luxury goods have more tax on them. This is the case with VAT as it is 20% in the UK and only paid on new products that are manufactured.

There are ad valorem taxes, but there are also constant taxes which have a tendency to be regressive. An example of constant can be noted in cigarettes for example there could be an added price of $5 on any base price.

IF it is a “solid” tax there is a shift in the supply curve

IF it is an “ad valorem” tax there is an inelastic response in supply

What is Tax Incidence?

Tax incidence is the effect on producer and consumer welfare after the tax is applied.

  • Inelastic PED means that most of the tax incidence is on consumers
  • Elastic PED means most of the tax incidence is on producers
  • Inelastic PES means that most of the tax incidence is on producers
  • Elastic PES means that most of the tax incidence is on consumers

When shown on graphs you can adjudge who loses and gains from the tax, as well as seeing what the government gains through the tax.


Governments provide subsidies when they believe a good is being under produced and under consumed. A subsidy allows there to be greater provision of the good or service largely in the case of merit goods which the government feels need to be provided more, at the same price for the consumer while the government pays the increase in price.

Subsidies can be given to firms or groups through various means such as soft loans, tax breaks, or even direct cash payment.

Why Subsidise?

Increase revenues for producers, while creating more supply for consumers at the same affordable prices. This reason is often found in agriculture where the government realises that people need more of a certain good at the same price.

Subsidies can encourage the consumption of merit goods which have an external benefit to society, such as aiding the payment of university degrees by allowing cheap low interest loans to students.

Can improve the allocation of resources, moving them where there is a positive externality, and can also help export market flourish within the sector. To an extent can help industries lift off such as the renewable energy sector receiving subsidies in the interest of cheaper renewable energy.

The creation of subsidy has the effect of shifting supply, increasing the amount supplied at the cost to the consumer. The government through whichever method of subsidy pays the price Pp for the quantity Sb to be supplied to the consumer.

P12 - Subsidy

What are issues with subsidy?

The issue of subsidies arises when they are removed, and the difficulty involved in the government accurately judging to what extent the subsidy should be allowed. The government to an extent eliminates competition from other firms if the subsidy is firm specific. There also arises the economic issue of scarcity, and the limited factors of production. As over-fishing receives subsidies but fish stocks have dramatically declined over the past few years, showing that the subsidy should be removed before edible fish stocks become extinct.

Price Controls:

The creations of price floors or ceilings by the government to either raise the price above equilibrium or below.

Price Ceiling (maximum): This is marked below equilibrium, usually creating a shortage of the good or service. Through this the price is lowered from the equilibrium price and not allowed to go back up.

Examples of price ceilings can be found for food or house rents. Historically price ceilings for house rents were imposed in various cities around the world most notably in New York City. In the example of NYC the local government set a price ceiling on the rent of property in Manhattan. This had effectively reduced the soaring prices of property, however with an increase in income more people were able to exert effective demand but there was a mass shortage of people willing to rent out property at those low prices. The result of this led to the creation of a black market, people started leasing to their friends or even friend of friends with informal contracts. The local government had started to realise what was occurring but could not force people to put their property on the market, and had eventually removed the price ceiling. People began to cue for property (not literally cueing but put on waiting lists)

Main effects of Price Floor

  • Shortage
  • Increased Demand but Lower Cost
  • Creation of Black Market
  • Market Inefficiency as part of the social surplus triangle is lost.

Price Floor (minimum): This is marked above equilibrium, usually creating a surplus of the good or service. Through this the price is raised above the equilibrium price and not allowed to drop down.

Examples of price floors is most commonly found in the usage of minimum wage, this is used to increase the wage workers are paid so they can keep up with the cost of living, and ensuring that workers cannot be exploited by firms. This is in place in many western democracies such as the U.S. or the U.K.

If labour is considered to be in the supply and demand concept of analysing the labour market, the introduction of minimum wage would mean there will be a surplus of labour (unemployment) this is because the price of labour has increased but the demand for labour remains unchanged. It means that firms may not hire as many people as they have higher wage demands to meet, however if the MRPL diagram is considered minimum wage does not always lead to unemployment.

There is a scenario where a black market is created, in this manner it would be the employment of illegal immigrants as they are not guaranteed the same protection and wage as regular workers. The black market undermines the creation of the minimum wage, as it is unlikely that employers would hire less people when they need more people. This means that there is the willingness to give up a percentage of revenues to continue meeting labour demands of the firm.

In the supply and demand of labour graph similar to the situation in price ceilings there is welfare loss due to the introduction of the minimum wage.

Market Failure:

Market failure is when the market does not efficiently allocate resources. When the price of product does not truly represents its cost to society or benefit to society.

It is the failure to reach Allocative efficiency where resources are being utilised to meet demand accurately while not causing unaccounted for negative or positive effects to a third party.

Market failure can be the over consumption of de-merit goods, or the under consumption of merit goods.  It can also be the under-allocation of resources to provide a good.  It is due to market failure that there are public goods, things that we need but fail to price accurately and so the government provides them.

What are externalities?

There are two types of externalities positive and negative.

Positive: When the consumption of the product or service has a positive benefit to a third party unaccounted for in the original transaction. An example of this is education, as through education one can find the cure for cancer which is priceless.

Negative: When the consumption of the product or service has a negative result to a third party and this is unaccounted for in the original transaction. An example of this is the pollution from factories, where the price we pay for the product does not represent the cost of the damage down to the environment.

Marginal Private Cost (MPC) is the supply curve when the cost of the externality is unaccounted

Marginal Social Cost (MSC) is the supply curve when the cost of the externality is shown

When the supply curve shows MPC and MSC it is the solution of the externality

Marginal Private Benefit (MPB) is the demand curve when the cost of the externality is unaccounted

Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) is the demand curve when cost of the externality is shown usually for positive externalities when the marginal private benefit and the benefit to society (3rd party) are accounted for.

Market failure can be shown when MPC = MPB but when MSC is shown but that MPB does not meet MSC. The difference between MSC and MPC is where the loss of welfare occurs, in the aim of solving the negative externality is when supply is shifted so that less is consumed. This is shown in the following graphs.

P13 - MSB Market Failure

Graph two shows the solution of the externality, whereas graph one displays that there is an externality and welfare loss.  In the solution shown in graph two there is the reduction of quantity demanded of the good, and this would be employed when there is the over-consumption of de-merit goods.

There are many solutions to negative externalities, the first point in the manner in which to solve them is to see if it is a negative externality due to the consumption of the product or service, or the supply of the product or service.

There are two ways to go about solving an externality, the first manner is to reduce the demand for the de-merit good, or to reduce demand for the good through a change in price of the good through tax or law.

Negative Externality Pollution:

In the case of pollution there has been the creation of tradable permits, these permits allow firms to pollute up to the limit set by the permit. The supply of them is perfectly inelastic as there is a fixed amount of the permits; this is in the interest of capping how much pollution there is within the country.  The fact that the permits are tradable makes them rivalrous, and therefore leads to an increase in price of the permits. Now it seems that it is a viable solution to pollution, however the issue is policing the permits which is extremely difficult to do as it is hard to tell whether the pollution is due to the firm.

Another issue with permits is that it is difficult to decide on what the maximum pollution should be, as it is not in the interest of the government to stifle the prosperity of certain markets. As well as there being a difficulty in handing out the permits initially to now show favouritism to large corporations.

Negative Externality Smoking:

In the case of smoking the externality is caused by the consumption of cigarettes. The first manner in which to reduce the demand for cigarettes is the informing of the public of the dangers of smoking and the creation of smear campaigns to discourage smokers. It has also become popular to introduce laws to prohibit smoking in certain locations, therefore discouraging smokers from smoking in the first place.

The other manner in which to solve the externality of smoking and create government revenue to help combat the externality of smoking is through the use of tax. Through increasing the price of cigarette packs there is an inwards shift of the supply curve of cigarettes, meaning that fewer consumers can exert effective demand to consume. However with this arises the issue of how much to tax, is it fairer to tax the consumer more or the producer more, and should it be location specific. All these issues make it difficult to correctly solve the externality, especially since not everyone gets cancer from smoking so why should one pay for it if it does not happen.

In the case of tax being introduced to solve an externality you can see the tax on the consumer is between the new equilibrium and the old equilibrium and the tax on the produce is from the new equilibrium down to the point of the supply line where the new equilibrium lies.  (Shown below)

P14 - Solving externality

Solving Positive Externalities:

This is rather simple as for positive externalities you want to reduce the price of the good or service while providing more. The best example is education where the government aims to provide more at a price that everyone can pay for, this encourages people to go to education and generally has a beneficial outcome to society.

There is also the case of healthcare, when you solve positive externalities you are removing the welfare loss of when the externality remains unsolved, so you increase the social benefit.

Governments are likely to provide subsidies and help for the creation and consumption of merit goods such as better education, healthcare, and quality of living. This is because the aim is to increase our benefit from society. The free market tends to undervalue merit goods such as education and healthcare, which is why the government ensures that they are consumed through laws and creation of supply.

Lack of Public Goods:

Public goods are non-rivalrous and non-excludable. This means that a public good can be consumed by anyone, and if it is consumed by one person it does not mean another person cannot consume it. The majority of public goods are provided by the government as they are under-consumed, under-provided, and are a necessity. An example of a public good is road lights, lighthouses, road signs, benches, parks, beaches, etc.

Private goods are always rivalrous and excludable, as if one person consumes it, it may mean that another person cannot. It also means that certain people cannot afford the good therefore making it exclusive to those with high disposable incomes.

The free-rider problem occurs when public goods are used, but there is no contribution to the government for the usage of these goods. As public goods are provided by the government through the usage of tax revenue, if someone who does not pay tax consumes the public good they are free riding. The best example is that of public transport, if someone jumps on a train without paying for a ticket they are free riding, but if they pay for the ticket they are taking their cost into account.

Public goods raise the issue of what should be a public good and to what extent should it be a public good, matters like transport have a tendency to be mixed between public and private, “impure public goods”.

When public goods are provided by the government there is the issue of creating a market that lacks any competiveness, and requires further government intervention to maintain it. This is why roads deteriorate and are not repaired, or why street lights may not work or are not as efficient but are not replaced.

Government compares marginal benefit vs. marginal cost, if they are equal the good is taken into consideration to be provided, but if the marginal cost is higher than the marginal benefit then it is not worth for the good to be  provided as a public good.

Common Access Resources:

Common access resources are resources that are free to use and relatively abundant, examples are:

  • Water, air, sunlight, lakes, rivers, oceans, nature, etc.


This is the issue of sustaining our economic activity as our natural capital is limited and must be protected. Sustainability is the protection of our economic resources to ensure future production, and the limiting of negative externalities.

The Lack of Price Mechanism for CAR’s (common access resources):

These resources tend to have the greatest abundance on our planet, such as water or air. We as consumer have a tendency to not fully realise the value of these resources to us on a daily basis, and the fact that there are no substitutes and the fact that it is non-rivalrous means that it can be exploited. This can be noted in the issue of pollution as we are ruining the quality of our air, and therefore exploiting a resource and causing it to degrade as a result of our production. The lack of paying for this is the creation of the negative externality in pollution, as causing air quality to degrade has adverse effects on our environment.

Fossil Fuels:

Usage of fossil fuels is problematic due to the scarcity of fossil fuels as our demand for them increases to meet our growing energy requirements. The issue of sustainability comes in when we attempt to determine how much longer we can depend of fossil fuels as our source of energy, and what affects our usage has on the environment.

The solving of the negative externality in the consumption of fossil fuels is carbon tax, which aims to account for the damage done to the environment by considering how much carbon dioxide is introduced into the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. There are several issues with this; it is difficult to tell what is naturally occurring or occurring due to consumption. It is also difficult to price the tax correctly as it is complex in nature to try and foretell what will happen to our environment.

The issue here arises as no one owns common access resources meaning that it is up to the international community to ensure that they are maintained in a sustainable manner, a way in which we do not exploit our natural resources to the point where we suffer adverse environmental damage in the quest for economic growth.


Poverty can lead to the over exploitation of land for the purpose of agriculture, as people attempt to break out of poverty. However this is unsustainable economic activity, as there is the result of damage the local environment, further intensifying the degree of poverty.

Asymmetric Information:

Consumers and Producers do not have the same information, or one party may be misinformed. This can lead to the under allocation of resources to provide certain goods.

If markets were completely unregulated there would be the issue of misinforming the consumer in the interest of the producer. An example could be the production of a hazardous clothing material, the consumer does not know it is hazardous but the producer does but still sells it in the interest of revenue. This is where the government attempts to come in and help consumers stay informed, this is done by forcing producers to be explicit about the information they have on their products regarding quality and safety.